Hannah Schultz is a teacher-scholar of 19th-century British and Global Anglophone literature. She is currently a Visiting Assistant Professor of English at Haverford College, teaching introductory and upper-level courses on topics such as 19th-century environmentalisms, postcolonial literature, and the literary representation of trees.
Having received her MFA in Creative Writing from Minnesota State University, Mankato, in 2020, she received her PhD in English from the University of Kentucky in 2025. Her research explores 19th-century British literature through ecocritical and feminist lenses, focusing on the co-constructive ideologies of androcentrism, imperialism, and racism. Her most recent article, “‘Cut off from the green reconciling earth’: Patriarchal Preservation and Ecological Subjectivity in Aurora Leigh,” was published in Victorian Review.
One of the things I’ll emphasize throughout this post is how much money you will save by going the more sustainable route (hint: it’s A LOT), but it is by no means the only positive outcome. By being a conscious consumer, you’re creating less waste, making a more stress-free environment for both you and baby, choosing materials and ingredients that are best for baby’s health and development, and more. Babies don’t actually need that much stuff and while we’re by no means minimalists, one of the first sustainable choices we made was to forgo a lot of the extraneous baby things that our consumerist society tells you that you need (even though you really don’t).